4.5 Article

Induction and comparison of different in vitro morphogenesis pathways using embryo of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) as a model material

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 293-311

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-007-9269-5

关键词

cumin; direct and indirect regeneration; genotype dependency; in vitro morphogenesis pathways; organogenesis; somatic embryogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, using cumin embryo as explant and manipulating plant growth regulators (PGRs) in regeneration medium, the main in vitro morphogenesis pathways including direct shoot organogenesis, direct somatic embryogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis, and indirect shoot organogenesis were obtained. The effects of PGRs, subculture, and light on the induction and progression of different pathways were studied in detail. Direct shoot organogenesis occurred on the meristematic zone, while direct somatic embryogenesis was observed on hypocotyl part of cumin embryo (more differentiated part). Application of BAP (0.1 mgl(-1)) was the sole triggering factor for induction of callus and indirect regeneration pathways. Exogenous IAA played the central role in the direct somatic embryogenesis pathway; however, the combined effects of IAA and NAA along with the high endogenous cytokinin level resulted in direct shoot organogenesis. Subculturing revealed accelerating effects on direct somatic embryogenesis pathway and callus formation. Conversely, subculturing had negative effect on direct shoot organogenesis pathway. In certain combinations of PGRs, like 0.4 mgl(-1) IAA + 0.4 mgl(-1) NAA, co-induction and co-regeneration of different pathways were observed. Investigation of genotype dependencies of different pathways showed that direct pathways are more genotype-dependent, stable, and faster than indirect pathways. This research presents the embryo of cumin as a convenient model material for induction and comparison of different morphogenesis pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据