4.6 Article

Development of an integrated metabolomic profiling approach for infectious diseases research

期刊

ANALYST
卷 136, 期 22, 页码 4752-4763

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1an15590c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  2. NIH [K12 HD001459-09, P30 HL101263-01, U54 AI057160, U01DK082315]
  3. [RR00954]
  4. [DK20579]
  5. [DK5634]
  6. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [K12HD001459] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR000954] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P30HL101263] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U54AI057160] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P60DK020579, U01DK082315] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolomic profiling offers direct insights into the chemical environment and metabolic pathway activities at sites of human disease. During infection, this environment may receive important contributions from both host and pathogen. Here we apply an untargeted metabolomics approach to identify compounds associated with an E. coli urinary tract infection population. Correlative and structural data from minimally processed samples were obtained using an optimized LC-MS platform capable of resolving similar to 2300 molecular features. Principal component analysis readily distinguished patient groups and multiple supervised chemometric analyses resolved robust metabolomic shifts between groups. These analyses revealed nine compounds whose provisional structures suggest candidate infection-associated endocrine, catabolic, and lipid pathways. Several of these metabolite signatures may derive from microbial processing of host metabolites. Overall, this study highlights the ability of metabolomic approaches to directly identify compounds encountered by, and produced from, bacterial pathogens within human hosts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据