4.6 Article

Non-invasive metabolomic analysis of breath using differential mobility spectrometry in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and healthy smokers

期刊

ANALYST
卷 135, 期 2, 页码 315-320

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b916374c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sionex Corporation
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. BBSRC
  4. HOSDB
  5. EU
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C519038/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_qA137293] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MC_qA137293] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid, accurate and non-invasive diagnosis of respiratory disease represents a challenge to clinicians, and the development of new treatments can be confounded by insufficient knowledge of lung disease phenotypes. Exhaled breath contains a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), some of which could potentially represent biomarkers for lung diseases. We have developed an adaptive sampling methodology for collecting concentrated samples of exhaled air from participants with impaired respiratory function, against which we employed two-stage thermal desorption gas chromatography-differential mobility spectrometry (GC-DMS) analysis, and showed that it was possible to discriminate between participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A 2.5 dm(3) volume of end tidal breath was collected onto adsorbent traps (Tenax TA/Carbotrap), from participants with severe COPD and healthy volunteers. Samples were thermally desorbed and analysed by GC-DMS, and the chromatograms analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA indicated several discriminatory (p < 0.01) signals, with good classification performance (receiver operator characteristic area up to 0.82). Partial least squares discriminant analysis using the full DMS chromatograms also gave excellent discrimination between groups (alpha = 19% and beta = 12.4%).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据