4.6 Article

Anesthetic properties of the ketone bodies ß-Hydroxybutyric acid and acetone

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 105, 期 3, 页码 673-679

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278127.68312.dc

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM069379] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that two metabolites that are elevated in ketosis (beta-hydroxybutyric acid, and acetone) modulate ion channels in a manner similar to anesthetics and produce anesthesia in animals. METHODS: alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2s)gamma-y-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)), alpha(1) glycine, NR1/NR2A N-methyl-D-aspartate, and two pore domain TRESK channels were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping. The effect of 0 hydroxybutyric acid and acetone on channel function was measured. The anesthetic effects of these drugs were measured in X. laevis tadpoles. RESULTS: Both 0 hydroxybutyric acid and acetone enhanced glycine receptor function in the concentration range that is obtained in ketoacidosis in humans. Beta hydroxybutyric acid also enhanced GABA, receptor function at these concentrations. Both acetone and beta-hydroxybutyric acid anesthetized tadpoles, with an EC50 for acetone of 264 +/- 2 mM (mean +/- SE) and for beta-hydroxybutyric acid of 151 +/- 11 mM at pH 7.0. Acetone enhanced GABA, receptors at concentrations of 50 mM and above. Inhibition of TRESK channel function was seen with 100 mM acetone or larger concentration. N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor function was inhibited at concentrations of acetone of 200 mM and larger. CONCLUSIONS: Beta hydroxybutyric acid and acetone are anesthetics. Both ketone bodies enhance inhibitory glycine receptors at concentrations observed clinically in ketoacidosis. In addition, P-hydroxybutyric acid enhances GABA, receptor function at these concentrations. Subanesthetic concentrations of these drugs may contribute to the lethargy and impairment of consciousness seen in ketoaciclosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据