4.8 Article

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance Imaging for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 46, 期 3, 页码 658-665

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.21747

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessing fibrosis but has several limitations. We evaluated a noninvasive method, so-called diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging 14 (DWMRI), which measures the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of water, for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). We analyzed 20 14 healthy volunteers and 54 patients with chronic HCV (METAVIR: F0, n = 1; F1, n = 30; F2, n = 8; F3, n = 5; and F4, n = 10) prospectively included. Patients with moderate-to-severe fibrosis (F2-F3-F4) had hepatic ADC values lower than those without or with mild fibrosis (F0-F1; mean: 1.10 +/- 0.11 versus 1.30 +/- 0.12 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and healthy volunteers (mean: 1.44 +/- 0.02 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). In discriminating patients staged F3-F4, the areas under the receiving operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were 0.92 (+/- 0.04) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 0.92 (+/- 0.05) for elastography, 0.79 (+/- 0.08) for FibroTest, 0.87 (+/- 0.06) for the aspartate aminotransferase to platelets ratio index (APRI), 0.86 (+/- 0.06) for the Forns index, and 0.87 (+/- 0.06) for hyaluronate. In these patients, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 87%, 87%, 72%, and 94%, respectively, with an ADC cutoff level of 1.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. In discriminating patients staged F2-F3-F4 the AUC values were 0.79 (+/- 0.07) for MRI, 0.87 ( 0.05) for elastography, 0.68 (+/- 0.09) for FibroTest, 0.81 (+/- 0.06) for APRI, 0.72 (+/- 0.08) for the Forns index, and 0.77 (+/- 0.06) for hyaluronate. Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that DWMRI compares favorably with other noninvasive tests for the presence of significant liver fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据