4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Serum and dialysate potassium concentrations and survival in hemodialysis patients

出版社

AMER SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.2215/CJN.04451206

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR18298] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK078106-01, R01DK078106, R01 DK078106] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: Controlling serum potassium is an important goal in maintenance hemodialysis patients. We examined the achievement of potassium balance through hemodialysis treatments and the associated fluctuations in serum potassium. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A 3-yr (July 2001 to June 2004) cohort of 81,013 maintenance hemodialysis patients from all DaVita dialysis clinics across the United States were studied. Nine quarterly-averaged serum potassium groups (< 4.0, >= 6.3 mEq/L and seven increments in-between) and four dialysate potassium concentration groups were created in each of the 12 calendar quarters. The death risk associated with predialysis potassium level and dialysate potassium concentration was examined using unadjusted, case-mix adjusted, and malnutrition-inflammation-adjusted time-dependent survival models. Results: Serum potassium correlated with nutritional markers. Serum potassium between 4.6 and 5.3 mEq/L was associated with the greatest survival, whereas potassium <4.0 or 2:>= 5.6 mEq/L was associated with increased mortality. The death risk of serum potassium >= 5.6 mEq/L remained consistent after adjustments. Higher dialysate potassium concentration was associated with increased mortality in hyperkalemic patients with predialysis serum potassium >= 5.0 mEq/L. Conclusions: A predialysis serum potassium of 4.6 to 5.3 mEq/L is associated with the greatest survival in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Hyperkalemic patients who undergo maintenance hemodialysis against lower dialysate bath may have better survival. Limitations of observational studies including confounding by indication should be considered when interpreting these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据