4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Joint design of tx-rx beamformers in MIMO downlink channel

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 55, 期 9, 页码 4639-4655

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2007.896292

关键词

beamforming; broadcast channels; convex optimization; geometric programming; multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider a single-cell multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) downlink channel where linear transmission and reception strategy is employed. The base station (BS) transmitter is equipped with a scheduler using a simple opportunistic beamforming strategy, which associates an intended user for each of the transmitted data streams. For the case when the channel of the scheduled users is available at the BS, we propose a general method for joint design of the transmit and the receive beamformers according to different optimization criteria, including weighted sum rate maximization, weighted sum mean square error minimization, minimum signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) maximization and sum power minimization under a minimum SINR constraint. The proposed method can handle multiple antennas at the BS and at the mobile user with single and/or multiple data streams per scheduled user. The optimization problems encountered in the beamformer design (e.g., covariance rank constraint) are not convex in general. Therefore, the problem of finding the global optimum is intrinsically nontractable. However, by exploiting the uplink-downlink SINR duality, we decompose the original optimization problem as a series of simpler optimization problems which can be efficiently solved by using standard convex optimization tools. Even though each subproblem is optimally solved, there is no guarantee that the global optimum has been found due to the nonconvexity of the problem. However, the simulations show that the algorithms converge fast to a solution, which can be a local optimum, but is still efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据