4.5 Article

Identification of rat Brainstem neuronal structures activated during cancer-induced anorexia

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 504, 期 3, 页码 275-286

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.21407

关键词

Morris 7777 hepatoma; Fos protein; area postrema; nucleus of the solitary tract; parabrachial nucleus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In cancer-related anorexia, body weight loss is paradoxically associated with reduced appetite, which is contrary to the situation during starvation, implying that the normal coupling of food intake to energy expenditure is disarranged. Here we examined brainstem mechanisms that may underlie suppression of food intake in a rat model of cancer anorexia. Cultured Morris 7777 hepatoma cells were injected subcutaneously in Buffalo rats, resulting in slowly growing tumor and reduced food intake and body weight loss after about 10 days. The brainstem was examined for induced expression of the transcription factors Fos and FosB as signs of neuronal activation. The results showed that anorexia and retarded body weight growth were associated with Fos protein expression in the area postrema, the general visceral region of the nucleus of the solitary tract, and the external lateral parabrachial nucleus, structures that also display Fos after peripheral administration of satiating or anorexigenic stimuli. The magnitude of the Fos expression was specifically related to the size of induced tumor, and not associated with weight loss per se, because it was not present in pair-fed or food-deprived rats. It also appeared to be independent of proinflammatory cytokines, as determined by the absence of increased cytokine levels in plasma and induced cytokine and cyclooxygenase expression in the brain. The findings thus provide evidence that cancer-associated anorexia and weight loss in this model is associated with activation of brainstem circuits involved in the suppression of food intake, and suggest that this occurs by inflammatory-independent mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据