4.6 Article

Involvement of the snake toxin receptor CLEC-2, in podoplanin-mediated platelet activation, by cancer cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 282, 期 36, 页码 25993-26001

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M702327200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Podoplanin ( aggrus), a transmembrane sialoglycoprotein, is involved in tumor cell-induced platelet aggregation, tumor metastasis, and lymphatic vessel formation. However, the mechanism by which podoplanin induces these cellular processes including its receptor has not been elucidated to date. Podoplanin induced platelet aggregation with a long lag phase, which is dependent upon Src and phospholipase C gamma 2 activation. However, it does not bind to glycoprotein VI. This mode of platelet activation was reminiscent of the snake toxin rhodocytin, the receptor of which has been identified by us as a novel platelet activation receptor, C-type lectin-like receptor 2 ( CLEC-2) ( Suzuki-Inoue, K., Fuller, G. L., Garcia, A., Eble, J. A., Pohlmann, S., Inoue, O., Gartner, T. K., Hughan, S. C., Pearce, A. C., Laing, G. D., Theakston, R. D., Schweighoffer, E., Zitzmann, N., Morita, T., Tybulewicz, V. L., Ozaki, Y., and Watson, S. P. ( 2006) Blood 107, 542-549). Therefore, we sought to evaluate whether CLEC-2 serves as a physiological counterpart for podoplanin. Association between CLEC-2 and podoplanin was confirmed by flow cytometry. Furthermore, their association was dependent on sialic acid on O-glycans of podoplanin. Recombinant CLEC-2 inhibited platelet aggregation induced by podoplanin-expressing tumor cells or lymphatic endothelial cells, suggesting that CLEC-2 is responsible for platelet aggregation induced by endo-genously expressed podoplanin on the cell surfaces. These findings suggest that CLEC-2 is a physiological target protein of podoplanin and imply that it is involved in podoplanin-induced platelet aggregation, tumor metastasis, and other cellular responses related to podoplanin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据