期刊
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 166, 期 6, 页码 646-655出版社
OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm165
关键词
bias (epidemiology); computer simulation; confounding factors (epidemiology); logistic models
资金
- Medical Research Council [G0600705] Funding Source: Medline
- Medical Research Council [G0600705] Funding Source: researchfish
- MRC [G0600705] Funding Source: UKRI
Measurement error in explanatory variables and unmeasured confounders can cause considerable problems in epidemiologic studies. It is well recognized that under certain conditions, nondifferential measurement error in the exposure variable produces bias towards the null. Measurement error in confounders will lead to residual confounding, but this is not a straightforward issue, and it is not clear in which direction the bias will point. Unmeasured confounders further complicate matters. There has been discussion about the amount of bias in exposure effect estimates that can plausibly occur due to residual or unmeasured confounding. In this paper, the authors use simulation studies and logistic regression analyses to investigate the size of the apparent exposure-outcome association that can occur when in truth the exposure has no causal effect on the outcome. The authors consider two cases with a normally distributed exposure and either two or four normally distributed confounders. When the confounders are uncorrelated, bias in the exposure effect estimate increases as the amount of residual and unmeasured confounding increases. Patterns are more complex for correlated confounders. With plausible assumptions, effect sizes of the magnitude frequently reported in observational epidemiologic studies can be generated by residual and/or unmeasured confounding alone.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据