4.6 Article

Spontaneous electrical and Ca2+ signals in typical and atypical smooth muscle cells and interstitial cell of Cajal-like cells of mouse renal pelvis

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 583, 期 3, 页码 1049-1068

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.137034

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrical rhythmicity in the renal pelvis provides the fundamental drive for the peristaltic contractions that propel urine from the kidney to bladder for storage until micturition. Although atypical smooth muscles (ASMCs) within the most proximal regions of the renal pelvis have long been implicated as the pacemaker cells, the presence of a sparsely distributed population of rhythmically active Kit-positive interstitial cells of Cajal-like cells (ICC-LCs) have confounded our understanding of pelviureteric peristalsis. We have recorded the electrical activity and separately visualized changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration in typical smooth muscle cells (TSMCs), ASMCs and ICC-LiCs using intracellular microelectrodes and a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator, fluo-4. Nifedipine (1-10 mu m)-sensitive driven action potentials and Ca2+ waves (frequency 6-15 min(-1)) propagated through the TSMC layer at a velocity of 1-2 mm s(-1). High frequency (10-40 min(-1)) Ca2+ transients and spontaneous transient depolarizations (STDs) were recorded in ASMCs in the absence or presence of 1 Am nifedipine. ICC-LCs displayed low frequency (1-3 min(-1)) Ca2+ transients which we speculated arose from cells that displayed action potentials with long plateaus (2-5 s). Neither electrical activity propagated over distances > 50 mu m. In 1 mu M nifedipine, ASMCs or ICC-LCs separated by < 30 mu m displayed some synchronicity in their Ca2+ transient discharge suggesting that they may well be acting as 'point sources' of excitation to the TSMC layer. We speculate that ASMCs act as the primary pacemaker in the renal pelvis while ICC-LCs play a supportive role, but can take over pacemaking in the absence of the proximal pacemaker drive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据