4.4 Article

Thermodynamics of Ni2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ binding to the urease metallochaperone UreE

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 46, 期 37, 页码 10506-10516

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi700171v

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK45686, R01 DK045686] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The two Ni2+ ions in the urease active site are delivered by the metallochaperone UreE, whose metal binding properties are central to the assembly of this metallocenter. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) has been used to quantify the stoichiometry, affinity, and thermodynamics of Ni2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+ binding to the well-studied C-tern-final truncated H144*UreE from Klebsiella aerogenes, Ni2+ binding to the wild-type K. aerogenes UreE protein, and Ni2+ and Zn2+ binding to the wild-type UreE protein from Bacillus pasteurii. The stoichiometries and affinities obtained by ITC are in good agreement with previous equilibrium dialysis results, after differences in pH and buffer competition are considered, but the concentration of H144*UreE was found to have a significant effect on metal binding stoichiometry. While two metal ions bind to the H I 44*UreE dimer at concentrations < 1 mu M, three Ni2+ or Cu2+ ions bind to 25 mu M dimeric protein with ITC data indicating sequential formation of Ni/Cu(H144*UreE)(4) and then (Ni/Cu)(2)(HI44*UreE)(4), or Ni/Cu(H144*UreE)(2), followed by the binding of four additional metal ions per tetramer, or two per dimer. The thermodynamics indicate that the latter two metal ions bind at sites corresponding to the two binding sites observed at lower protein concentrations. Ni2+ binding to UreE from K. aerogenes is an enthalpically favored process but an entropically driven process for the B. pasteurii protein, indicating chemically different Ni2+ coordination to the two proteins. A relatively small negative value of Delta Cp is associated with Ni2+ and Cu2+ binding to H144*UreE at low protein concentrations, consistent with binding to surface sites and small changes in the protein structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据