4.7 Article

Morphology and rheology of immiscible polymer blends filled with silica nanoparticles

期刊

POLYMER
卷 48, 期 20, 页码 6029-6040

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.061

关键词

silica; blends; linear viscoelasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of silica nanoparticles on the morphology and the theological properties of an immiscible polymer blend (polypropylene/polystyrene, PP/PS 70/30) was investigated. Two types of pyrogenic nanosilica were used: a hydrophilic silica with a specific surface area of 200 m(2)/g and a hydrophobic silica having a specific surface area of 150 m(2)/g. First, a significant reduction in the PS droplet volume radius, from 3.25 to nearly 1 mu m for filled blends with 3 wt% silica, was observed. More interestingly, image analysis of the micrographs proved that the hydrophilic silica tends to confine in the PS phase whereas hydrophobic one was located in the PP phase and at the PP/PS interface (interphase thickness approximate to 100-200 n). Furthermore, a migration of hydrophilic silica from PP phase toward PS domains was observed. An analysims of the rheological experimental data was based on the framework of the Palierne model, extended to filled immiscible blends. Due to the partition of silica particles in the two phases and its influence on the viscosity ratio, limited cases have been investigated. The rheological data obtained with the hydrophobic silica were more difficult to model since the existence of a thick interphase cannot be taken into account by the model. Finally, the hypothesis that hydrophilic silica is homogeneously dispersed in PS droplets and that hydrophobic silica is dispersed in PP matrix was much closer to the actual situation. It can be then concluded that stabilization mechanism of PP/PS blend by hydrophilic silica is the reduction in the interfacial tension whereas hydrophobic silica acts as a rigid layer preventing the coalescence of PS droplets. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据