4.7 Article

Vitamin D deficiency is associated with the metabolic syndrome in morbid obesity

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 573-580

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.05.009

关键词

vitamin D; metabolic syndrome; obesity; lipids; insulin resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & aims: Vitamin D deficiency has been recently associated with the metabolic syndrome. However, it is not known whether this possible association of vitamin D deficiency with the metabolic syndrome is still present at very high degrees of obesity, as in morbidly obese patients. Methods: Transversal, observational study that included 73 consecutive morbidly obese patients (body mass index >= 40kg/ M). In every patient, anthropometric variables were recorded, fasting blood was assayed for 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, lipid profiles, glucose and insulin levels, and insulin resistance was estimated by homeostasis model. assessment. Results: Vitamin D deficiency was present in 37 of the 73 patients (50.7%). As defined by revised Adult Treatment Panel III criteria, 46 of the 73 obese patients (63%) had the metabolic syndrome. Vitamin D deficiency was more prevalent in morbidly obese patients presenting with the metabolic syndrome, compared with those who did not achieve the criteria for this syndrome (60.9% vs. 33.3% respectively, P = 0.023). When serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D were categorized in tertiles, there was an association of the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome with the former (P = 0.038). Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations were tower (37.0 +/- 7.8mg/dl vs. 44.9 +/- 8.7mg/dl, P = 0.003), and triglycerides levels were higher (163.3 +/- 81.5 mg/dl vs. 95.1 +/- 24.2mg/dl, P = 0.001) in the vitamin D-deficient group. Conclusion: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with the metabolic syndrome in morbidly obese patients. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据