4.6 Article

Atmospheric deceleration and light curves of Draconid meteors and implications for the structure of cometary dust

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 473, 期 2, 页码 661-672

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078131

关键词

meteors; meteoroids; comets : individual : 21P/Giacobini-Zinner

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. The observation of Draconid meteors was used to infer information on the structure, porosity, strength, and composition of the dust of comet 21P/Giacobini-Zinner. Methods. Stereoscopic video and photographic observations of six faint and one bright Draconid meteors provided meteor morphologies, heights, light curves, and atmospheric decelerations. The spectrum of the bright meteor was also obtained. We developed a simple model of meteoroid ablation and fragmentation. The model assumes that cometary meteoroids are composed of constituent grains. Results. By fitting the observed decelerations and light curves, we have found that the grain mass range was relatively narrow in all meteoroids but differed from case to case. Some meteoroids were coarse grained with grain masses 10(-9) to 10(-10) kg, others were fine grained with grain masses one order of magnitude lower. Individual mm-sized meteoroids contained tens of thousands to almost a million grains (assuming grain density close to 3000 kgm(-3)). The meteoroids were porous aggregates of grains, having porosities of about 90% and bulk densities of 300 kgm(-3). Grain separation started after the surface of the meteoroid received energy of 106 Jm(-2). The separation continued during the first half of meteor trajectories. We call this phase erosion. The energy needed for grain erosion was 15-30 x lower than the energy of vaporization. However, 30% of the largest meteoroid was resistant to thermal erosion; this part disrupted later mechanically under a very low dynamic pressure of 5 kPa. The relative abundances of Na, Mg, and Fe were nearly chondritic, but differential ablation caused preferential loss of sodium at the beginning of the trajectory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据