4.0 Article

Cryptic species and species pairs in lichens: A discussion on the relationship between molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

期刊

ANALES DEL JARDIN BOTANICO DE MADRID
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 71-81

出版社

CONSEJO SUPERIOR INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS-CSIC
DOI: 10.3989/ajbm.2225

关键词

lichenized Ascomycota; morphological characters; reproductive strategies; species concepts

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CGL 2007-64652/BOS, CGL2008-01125-E/BOS]
  2. MEC, Spain [CGL2006-12179-CO2-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As with most disciplines in biology, molecular genetics has revolutionized our understanding of lichenized fungi, Nowhere has this been more true than in systematics, especially in the delimitation of species. In many cases, molecular research has verified long-standing hypotheses, but in others, results appear to conflict with existing morphological species concepts. This work reports on recent progress regarding two main issues: (i) cryptic species, i.e., two or more independent lineages exhibiting similar morphology; and (ii) species pairs, two species with similar morphology but exhibiting different reproductive modes. Both concepts have in common a lack of correlation between phylogenetic and morphological data, at least for characters normally used in lichen systematics. We review the available literature on cryptic species and species pairs, focusing especially on the family Parmeliaceae (Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota). Molecular data have repeatedly demonstrated the existence of cryptic species in lichenized fungi, although taxonomists have often been slow to recognize the resulting taxa. However, careful observation of fine-scale morphological, ecological and/or geographical features tends to provide support for the recognition of these species. In the case of species pairs, by contrast, few if any of the pairs studied to date have been confirmed to consist of independent lineages. Differences in reproductive mode alone appear not to be a sufficient reason to recognise new species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据