4.3 Article

Lessons from a multisite International trial in the Caribbean and South America of an HIV-1 Canarypox vaccine (ALVAC-HIV vCP1452) with or without boosting with MN rgp120

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318149297d

关键词

HIV; vaccine; canarypox; clinical trial; clade B; developing world

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U01 AI46725, U01 AI46747] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The first multicenter, international National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)-sponsored HIV vaccine trial took place in Brazil, Haiti, Peru and Trinidad. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a clade B-derived, live canarypox HIV vaccine, vCP1452. vCP1452 was administered alone or with a heterologous boost of MN rgp 120 glycoprotein. The trial was pivotal in deciding whether these vaccines advanced to phase 3 efficacy trials. Methods: Forty seronegative volunteers per site were randomized to ALVAC alone, ALVAC plus MN rgp 120, or placebo in a 0, 1, 3, and 6 month schedule. Immunogenicity was assayed by chromium-release cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses; interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays (ELISpot); lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPA); neutralization; and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Results: Enrollment and follow-up were excellent. Both vaccines were well tolerated. Neutralizing antibody to the laboratory-adapted MN strain was detected. Cellular immune responses, as measured by CTL, ELISpot, and LPA, did not differ between vaccines and placebos. Conclusions: The observation of disappointing immunogenicity in this and a parallel domestic study has informed future vaccine development. Equally important, challenges to doing an integrated trial across countries, cultures, languages, and differing at-risk populations were overcome. The identification of specific safety, ethical, logistic, and immunological issues in this trial established the foundation for current larger international studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据