4.6 Article

Physical function in men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy

期刊

PHYSICAL THERAPY
卷 87, 期 10, 页码 1325-1333

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOC
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20060302

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCATS NIH HHS [UL1 TR000005] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000056] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIA NIH HHS [P30 AG024827] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [K24 DK062895] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Purpose Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has become an increasingly standard intervention for both early and advanced stages of prostate cancer; however, decreased physical function and hypogonadism have been reported in men receiving ADT. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine whether ADT (and hypogonadism) resulted in decreased strength and mobility and (2) to examine the effect of ADT on an associated test of cognitive and motor function by assessing visuomotor performance. Subjects and Methods Physical function, walking speed, visuomotor performance, gonadal status, body composition, and Comorbidity Disease Index (CMDI) scores were assessed in a cohort of 100 participants that included: (1) men with prostate cancer who were not on ADT, (2) men with prostate cancer who were on short-term ADT (<6 months), (3) men with prostate cancer who were on long-term ADT (>= 6 months), and (4) control subjects who did not have prostate cancer. Results Walking speed varied significantly across the 4 groups, even after adjusting for age, CMDI, and percentage of body fat. Age and CMDI were significantly associated with measurements of physical performance. Adjusted for covariates, men on long-term ADT walked 0.18 m/s slower than the control subjects. Physical function also varied significantly across the 4 groups. Androgen deprivation therapy did not have a significant effect on visuomotor performance. Discussion and Conclusion The results suggest that ADT has a significant effect on walking speed and physical performance in men with prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据