4.2 Article

Quality of life outcomes after ventilating tube insertion for otitis media in an Australian population

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.06.001

关键词

quality of life; acute otitis media; otitis media with effusion; ventilating tubes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the change in quality of life in a group of Australian children with recurrent acute otitis media (AOM) and/or otitis media with effusion (OME) who were treated with ventilating tube (VT) insertion. Methods: Prospective pre- and post-intervention outcome study at the Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia. The Otitis Media 6-item (OM-6) survey was used as a measure of disease-specific quality of life prior to surgery and then again at 6 weeks post-operatively. Any patients who were listed for any additional ear, nose or throat (ENT) procedures at the same time were excluded. Results: Complete responses for both pre- and post-surgery questionnaires were obtained from the parents of 53 patients. The age range was 11 months to 15.4 years (average 5.1 years), and 39.6% (n = 21) were suffering from recurrent AOM whilst the remaining 60.4% (n = 32) were suffering from OME. Overall ear-related quality of life was found to improve significantly following insertion of ventilating tubes (p < 0.001), as was the mean OM-6 score (p < 0.001). Furthermore, statistically significant improvements were noted in each individual domain making up the OM-6 survey (physical suffering, hearing toss, speech impairment, emotional distress, activity limitations and caregiver concerns). Conclusions: The disease-specific quality of life of a group of Australian pediatric patients with otitis media was found to significantly improve following insertion of ventilating tubes as measured by the OM-6 survey. Improvements were found in global ear-related quality of life, in the mean OM-6 score, as well as in all individual domains of the OM-6 survey. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据