4.7 Article

Potentially useful biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer

期刊

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 61, 期 9, 页码 515-519

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2007.08.005

关键词

lung cancer; molecular biomarkers; translational research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lung cancer ranks top in both incidence and mortality in most part of the world. Scientists strive to explore biomarkers and their possible role in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of lung cancer. The ultimate goal is to discover biomarkers that can be tested in clinical trials and finally applied to patient care. Highly elevated concentrations of cytokeratin 19 fragment, tissue polypeptide antigen and squamous cell carcinoma antigen in non-small cell lung cancer particularly for squamous cell carcinoma, carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 125 in adenocarcinoma or non-small cell lung cancer, as well as progastrin-releasing peptide and neuron specific enolase in small cell lung cancer are suggestive biomarkers for the malignancy. Despite, extensive studies, most results still remain controversial. Even with the report of high percent sensitivity and specificity, validation by clinical trials in large cohorts of patients is necessary before the cancer-related phenotypes can be translated into the clinic as reliable biomarkers. Nevertheless, identifications of biomarkers are leading to more understanding of the molecular pathways involved in lung cancer. It is hoped that understanding the connections between cellular pathways will help to reduce the suffering and loss of life caused by the lethal disease. This article summarizes the pre-clinical and translational researches against lung cancer in relation to biomarker discovery and validation. It is intended for policy makers, researchers, clinicians and other health professionals, offering a variety of useful biomarkers and updated data of clinical trials for lung cancer. (C) 2007 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据