4.7 Review

Mesenchymal stem cells in rheumatology: a regenerative approach to joint repair

期刊

CLINICAL SCIENCE
卷 113, 期 7-8, 页码 339-348

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20070126

关键词

arthritis; cartilage repair; inflammation; regenerative medicine; mesenchymal stem cell

资金

  1. MRC [G108/620] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [G108/620] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [G108/620] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advent of biologics in rheumatology has considerably changed the evolution and prognosis of chronic inflammatory arthritis. The success of these new treatments has contributed to steering more attention to research focussed on repair and remodelling of joint tissues. Indeed, when the tissue damage is established, treatment options are very limited and the risk of progression towards joint destruction and failure remains high. Increasing evidence indicates that mesenchymal stem cells persist postnatally within joint tissues. It is postulated that they would function to safeguard joint homoeostasis and guarantee tissue remodelling and repair throughout life. Alterations in mesenchymal stein cell biology in arthritis have indeed been reported but a causal relationship has not been demonstrated, mainly because our current knowledge of mesenchymal stem cell niches and functions within the joint in health and disease is very limited. Nonetheless, mesenchymal stem cell technologies have attracted the attention of the biomedical research community as very promising tools to achieve the repair of joint tissues such as articular cartilage, subchondral bone, menisci and tendons. This review will outline stem-cell-mediated strategies for the repair of joint tissues, spanning from the use of expanded mesenchymal stem cell populations to therapeutic targeting of endogenous stem cells, resident in their native tissues, and related reparative signals in traumatic, degenerative and inflammatory joint disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据