4.2 Article

Influence of growth stage on fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol production in wheat

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY
卷 155, 期 10, 页码 577-581

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2007.01281.x

关键词

Gibberella zeae; tricothecenes; fungal infection; toxigenic fungi; food safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fusarium head blight is a major concern for wheat production worldwide. The fungi that cause the disease may infect head tissues from flowering to late stages of kernel development, but a better understanding of the influence of the time of infection on grain weight reduction and mycotoxin accumulation resulting from the infection process is needed. We investigated the influence of wheat reproductive stage at the time of inoculation on disease and grain quality parameters, especially production of deoxynivalenol (DON) in mature grains. Heads of Norm wheat were spray inoculated with a macroconidial suspension of a DON-producing isolate of Fusarium graminearum at each of six reproductive stages from flowering to hard dough. Plants were incubated in a mist chamber for 48 h and then moved to the greenhouse until maturity. Norm wheat was susceptible at all stages inoculated but the highest grain weight reduction and DON accumulation occurred in plants inoculated past flowering to late milk stages. However, high incidences of kernel infection and significant levels of DON accumulation resulted from inoculations as late as the hard dough stage, even though there was no corresponding reduction in grain weight compared to non-inoculated plants. The occurrence of commercially significant levels of DON in plump, high-yielding wheat may result from infections that occur during favourable environments well after the flowering stages. Late infection and DON production should therefore be a future research focus for wheat breeding and integrated management of FHB and an important consideration for grading systems that employ the presence of visibly damaged kernels as a means of estimating DON content of wheat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据