4.6 Article

Dust sedimentation in protoplanetary disks with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 473, 期 2, 页码 457-466

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077581

关键词

accretion; accretion disks; circumstellar matter; stars : formation; stars : pre-main-sequence; infrared : stars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. Dust sedimentation is known to affect the infrared spectra and images of disks. In particular the far-infrared emission may be reduced by strong sedimentation. However, dust grains of different sizes sediment to different depths in the disk. Spectral features of one species may thus be enhanced, while those of other species may be suppressed. Aims. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ( PAHs) are among the smallest dust grains. We investigate how the presence of PAHs in protoplanetary disks affects the disk's spectral energy distribution (SED) and feature strengths when the thermal ( large) grains are allowed to sediment. Methods. We calculate the vertical distribution of dust grains for both the PAH dust and the thermal dust grains. We include vertical settling and vertical mixing via turbulence. The results are inserted into a Monte-Carlo radiative transfer code to compute the SEDs. Results. For high turbulence the sedimentation barely affects the spectrum. For low turbulence, however, the PAHs still stay well-mixed in the disk's surface layer, while the 0.1 mu m size grains sediment deep into the disk. This strongly enhances the PAH features relative to the continuum ( by factors of 2 to 10), while the far-infrared flux is reduced. This predicts that sources with weak far-infrared flux have stronger PAH features, which is - at least among Herbig Ae stars - opposite to what is observed, suggesting that sedimentation is not the only factor responsible for the weak mid-to far-infrared excess in some disks. We speculate that coagulation might be a solution, reducing both the mid-to far-infrared flux and the PAH features.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据