4.6 Article

Reduced Cβ statistical potentials can outperform all-atom potentials in decoy identification

期刊

PROTEIN SCIENCE
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 2123-2139

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1110/ps.072939707

关键词

protein folding; statistical potentials; reduced models; decoy sets

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R29 GM055694, R01 GM055694] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a series of statistical potentials to recognize the native protein from decoys, particularly when using only a reduced representation in which each side chain is treated as a single C-beta atom. Beginning with a highly successful all-atom statistical potential, the Discrete Optimized Protein Energy function ( DOPE), we considered the implications of including additional information in the all-atom statistical potential and subsequently reducing to the Cb representation. One of the potentials includes interaction energies conditional on backbone geometries. A second potential separates sequence local from sequence nonlocal interactions and introduces a novel reference state for the sequence local interactions. The resultant potentials perform better than the original DOPE statistical potential in decoy identification. Moreover, even upon passing to a reduced Cb representation, these statistical potentials outscore the original (all-atom) DOPE potential in identifying native states for sets of decoys. Interestingly, the backbone-dependent statistical potential is shown to retain nearly all of the information content of the all-atom representation in the Cb representation. In addition, these new statistical potentials are combined with existing potentials to model hydrogen bonding, torsion energies, and solvation energies to produce even better performing potentials. The ability of the Cb statistical potentials to accurately represent protein interactions bodes well for computational efficiency in protein folding calculations using reduced backbone representations, while the extensions to DOPE illustrate general principles for improving knowledge-based potentials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据