4.2 Article

Local tolerance and systemic safety of pegaptanib sodium in the dog and rabbit

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2006.0149

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the local tolerance, systemic toxicity, and toxicokinetics in dogs and rabbits of pegaptanib sodium, an aptamer that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF(165)) Methods: Dogs received biweekly, bilateral, intravitreous (IVT) injections of pegaptanib sodium for 9 months at doses of 0.3 (n = 10), 1 (n = 10), or 3 mg (n = 14); 14 control dogs received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). In rabbits, pegaptanib sodium was administered by IVT injection biweekly for 6 months at doses of 0.2 (n = 14), 0.67 (n = 14), or 2 mg (n = 18); 18 rabbits; received PBS. The systemic and ocular safety of pegaptanib sodium was assessed. Assessments in both dogs and rabbits included complete ophthalmologic examinations, serum chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and coagulation assessments, as well as gross and microscopic pathologic examination. In addition, dogs were assessed by electroretinography and electrocardiography. In a cardiovascular safety study, loading intravenous boluses and maintenance infusions of pegaptanib sodium or PBS were administered to dogs (n = 4) in an ascending dose design, with each dose level separated by 2-3 days. The pegaptanib dosing regimens were designed to achieve pegaptanib plasma concentrations of approximately 90, 270, or 900 ng/mL. Results: There were no pegaptanib sodium-associated clinical ophthalmologic, pathologic, or cardiovascular abnormalities at doses of pegaptanib that achieved systemic and ocular exposure levels in excess of those associated with the recommended pegaptanib IVT dosing regimen of 0.3 mg per study eye in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Conclusion: These studies, together with data from clinical trials, provide strong evidence that inhibition of VEGF(165) by pegaptanib in the eye is a safe therapy for the treatment of ocular neovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据