4.5 Article

High levels of genetic divergence and inbreeding in populations of cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum)

期刊

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 289-298

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-006-0066-9

关键词

cacao; cocoa; genetic diversity; Malvaceae sensu lato; simple sequence repeat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Theobroma grandiflorum (cupuassu) is an important fruit tree native to the Brazilian Amazon. Establishing the genetic diversity and structure of populations is critical to define long-term strategies for cupuassu conservation presently threatened by rapid deforestation. Three natural populations collected at the putative center of diversity, three groups of accessions established at a germplasm collection, and one derived from commercial plantings were analyzed. The genetic diversity was assessed using 21 polymorphic microsatellite loci originally developed for Theobroma cacao, disclosing a total of 113 alleles. The estimated genetic diversity parameters averaged over cupuassu populations (A=3.53 alleles per locus; H-e=0.426;. H-O=0.346) were lower than the values reported for other Neotropical tree species. The three natural populations presented a positive and significant fixation index (f), ranging from 0.133 to 0.234. Cupuassu apparently adhered to a general pattern of genetic diversity structure of some Neotropical tree species occurring at low densities, with a low intrapopulation genetic diversity and important levels of endogamy, possibly due to biparental inbreeding derived from the presence of spatial genetic structure in the populations. A high level of genetic divergence was detected among the natural populations (theta(p)=0.301), a strong differentiation caused by limited gene flow, and suggesting that human interference in spreading and/or stimulating plantings might have had a smaller effect than expected. The approximate location of the T grandiflorum center of diversity could not be confirmed by analyzing natural populations from the putative region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据