4.4 Article

Influence of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and fumarate on methane production, microbial growth and fermentation in Rusitec fermenters

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
卷 98, 期 4, 页码 753-761

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507744446

关键词

fibrolytic enzymes; fumarate; rumen microbial growth; Rusitec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two incubation runs were conducted with Rusitec fermenters to investigate the effects of three additive treatments (mixed fibrolytic enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum (FE), disodium fumarate (FUM) and both additives (MIX)) on rumen microbial growth and fermentation of a grass hay:concentrate (600: 400 g/kg DM) substrate. Each fermenter received daily 20 g substrate DM. Application rate (per g substrate DM) was 34.3 endoglucanase, 0.57 exoglucanase, 24.7 xylanase and 5.51 amylase units for FE and 30 mg fumarate for FUM. MIX fermenters received both additives. Both FE and MIX increased (P<0.05) daily production of acetate, butyrate and methane, substrate DM and fibre disappearance at 6 and 48 h incubation, daily flow of microbial-N, and the microbial colonisation of substrate at 6 h incubation. Compared to FE, MIX treatment increased (P<0.05) propionate production by 28% and decreased (P<0.05) the acetate: propionate ratio, but no other differences between both treatments were found (P>0.05). Supplementing with FUM increased (P<0.05) volatile fatty acid production by 11% and decreased (P<0.05) the acetate: propionate ratio, but did not affect (P>0.05) any other variable, thus suggesting that observed effects were due to fermentation of FUM itself. The lack of effects of FUM and the absence of differences between FE and MIX on most of the measured variables would indicate that beneficial effects found in MIX fermenters were mainly due to the action of FE. Combining FE and FUM as feed additives under the conditions of the present experiment did not further improve rumen fermentation, compared to FE alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据