Comparison of different methods for measuring leaf area index in a mixed grassland

Available LAI instruments have greatly increased our ability to estimate leaf area index (LAI) non-destructively. However, it is difficult to infer from existing studies which instrument has the advantages in measuring LAI over other instruments for grassland ecosystems. The objective of our study was to compare the LAI estimates by two instruments (AccuPAR, and LAI2000), and correlate the LAI measurements to remote sensing data for a mixed grassland. Leaf area index of four grass communities was measured by both the destructive method and instruments. Ground canopy reflectance was measured and further calculated to be LAI-related vegetation indices. Statistical analysis showed that destructively sampled LAI ranged from 0.61 to 5.7 in the study area. Both instruments underestimated LAI in comparison with the destructive method. However, the LAI 2000 is better than AccuPAR for estimating LAI. Comparison of four grass communities indicated that the lower the grass LAI, the greater the underestimated percentage of LAI values collected by both instruments. The adjusted transformed soil-adjusted vegetation index (ATSAVI), was the best LAI estimator in the mixed grassland.