4.5 Article

RCC1 isoforms differ in their affinity for chromatin, molecular interactions and regulation by phosphorylation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 120, 期 19, 页码 3436-3445

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.009092

关键词

RCC1; Ran; nuclear transport; mitosis

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C007778/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C007778/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RCC1 is the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Ran GTPase. Generation of Ran-GTP by RCC1 on chromatin provides a spatial signal that directs nucleocytoplasmic transport, mitotic spindle assembly and nuclear envelope formation. We show that RCC1 is expressed in human cells as at least three isoforms, named RCC1 alpha, RCC1 beta and RCC1 gamma, which are expressed at different levels in specific tissues. The beta and gamma isoforms contain short inserts in their N-terminal regions ( NTRs) that are not present in RCC1 alpha. This region mediates interaction with chromatin, binds importin alpha 3 and/or importin beta, and contains regulatory phosphorylation sites. RCC1 gamma is predominantly localised to the nucleus and mitotic chromosomes like RCC1 alpha. However, compared to RCC1 alpha, RCC1 gamma has a greatly reduced interaction with an importin alpha 3-beta and a stronger interaction with chromatin that is mediated by the extended NTR. RCC1 gamma is also the isoform that is most highly phosphorylated at serine 11 in mitosis. Unlike RCC1 alpha, RCC1 gamma supports cell proliferation in tsBN2 cells more efficiently when serine 11 is mutated to non-phosphorylatable alanine. Phosphorylation of RCC1 gamma therefore specifically controls its function during mitosis. These results show that human RCC1 isoforms have distinct chromatin binding properties, different molecular interactions, and are selectively regulated by phosphorylation, as determined by their different NTRs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据