4.4 Article

Internal hernia as a complication of laparoscopic Rouix-en-Y gastric bypass

期刊

OBESITY SURGERY
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 1283-1286

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-007-9229-5

关键词

laproscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; internal hernia; small bowel obstruction; bariatric surgery

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Internal hernia (I-H) is a well known complication of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) which is more frequently encountered when the RYGBP is done laparoscopically. Methods: Patients with IH were identified from a prospective data-base of morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery at our center. Results: 10 patients with IH were identified out of 625 patients undergoing LRYGBP from 1998 to 2006 (incidence 1.6 %). The defects were closed in the last 155 cases with non-absorbable running sutures. There were 8 women and 2 men with mean age 38 years (range 2854). The mean interval of time elapsed between LRYGBP and clinical presentation of IH was 26.5 months (range 7 days - 72 months). Abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting were the most common complaints. White blood cell count was increased to a mean of 64 mg/dl (range 45-155 mg/dl) in 6 patients. CT scan showed signs of intestinal obstruction in all 7 patients with acute presentation. Surgery was done by laparoscopy in 5 cases (2 in the setting of emergency), and by laparotomy in the remaining 5 cases. All IHs were located at the mesenteric defect and were treated with IH reduction in all but one patient who underwent small bowel resection. There was no mortality, and one patient had pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome that resolved favorably. Conclusions: IH after LRYGBP occurred mainly at the mesenteric defect and in patients with no closure of the defect. The antecolic approach for the Roux-limb, the division of the greater omentum only when too thick, and the systematic closure of the defects with tight non-absorbable running sutures are recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据