4.7 Article

In vivo cytotoxicity of insulin-specific CD8+ T-cells in HLA-A*0201 transgenic NOD mice

期刊

DIABETES
卷 56, 期 10, 页码 2551-2560

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db07-0332

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA13330] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK46266, DK77500, DK69280, DK64315, DK52956, DK51090, DK20541] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-CD8(+) T-cells specific for islet antigens are essential for the development of type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse model of the disease. Such T-cells can also be detected in the blood of type 1 diabetic patients, suggesting their importance in the pathogenesis of the human disease as well. The development of peptide-based therapeutic reagents that target islet-reactive CD8(+) T-cells will require the identification of disease-relevant epitopes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We used islet-infiltrating CD8(+) T-cells from HLA-A*0201 transgenic NOD mice in an interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay to identify autoantigenic peptides targeted during the spontaneous development of disease. We concentrated on insulin (Ins), which is a key target of the autoimumne response in NOD mice and patients alike. RESULTS-We found that HLA-A*0201-restricted T-cells isolated from the islets of the transgenic mice were specific for Ins1 L3-11, Ins1 B5-14, and Ins1/2 A2-10. Insulin-reactive T-cells were present in the islets of mice as young as 5 weeks of age, suggesting an important function for these specificities early in the pathogenic process. Although there was individual variation in peptide reactivity, Ins1 B5-14 and Ins1/2 A2-10 were the immunodominant epitopes. Notably, in vivo cytotoxicity to cells bearing these peptides was observed, further confirming them as important targets of the pathogenic process. CONCLUSIONS-The human versions of B5-14 and A2-10, differing from the murine peptides by only a single residue, represent excellent candidates to explore as CD8(+) T-cell targets in HLA-A*0201-positive type I diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据