4.3 Article

Low water quality in tropical fishponds in southeastern Brazil

期刊

ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 1181-1195

出版社

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201420130092

关键词

cyanobacteria; cyanotoxins; eutrophication; fish culture

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil [31001017014P9]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [307727/2009-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expansion of aquaculture around the world has heavily impacted the environment. Because fertilizers are needed to raise fish, one of the main impacts is eutrophication, which lowers water quality and increases the frequency of algal blooms, mostly cyanobacteria. To evaluate whether the water quality in 30 fishponds in southeastern Brazilian met the requirements of Brazilian legislation, we analyzed biotic and abiotic water conditions. We expected that the high nutrient levels due to fertilization would cause low water quality. We also analyzed cyanotoxins in seston and fish muscle in some systems where cyanobacteria were dominant. The fishponds ranged from eutrophic and hypereutrophic with high phytoplankton biomass. Although cyanobacteria were dominant in most of the systems, cyanotoxins occurred in low concentrations, possibly because only two of the 12 dominant species were potential producers of microcystins. The high phosphorus concentrations caused the low water quality by increasing cyanobacteria, chlorophyll-a, turbidity, and thermotolerant coliforms, and by depleting dissolved oxygen. We found that all the 30 systems were inappropriate for fish culture, according to Brazilian legislation, based on at least one of the parameters measured. Furthermore, there was not any single system in the water-quality thresholds, according to the Brazilian legislation, to grow fish. Our findings indicate the need for better management to minimize the impacts of eutrophication in fishponds, in addition to a rigorous control to guarantee good food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据