4.6 Article

Intraportal GLP-1 infusion increases nonhepatic glucose utilization without changing pancreatic hormone levels

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00275.2007

关键词

dog; liver; glucagon-like peptide-1; hepatic portal vein

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01-DK-43706] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After a meal, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels in the hepatic portal vein are elevated and are twice those in peripheral blood. The aim of this study was to determine whether any of GLP-1' s acute metabolic effects are initiated within the hepatic portal vein. Experiments consisted of a 40-min basal period, followed by a 240-min experimental period, during which conscious 42-h-fasted dogs received glucose intraportally (4 mg center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1)) and peripherally (as needed) to maintain arterial plasma glucose levels at similar to 160 mg/dl. In addition, saline was given intraportally (CON; n = 8) or GLP-1 (1 pmol center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1)) was given into the hepatic portal vein (POR; n = 11) or the hepatic artery (HAT; n = 8). Portal vein plasma GLP-1 levels were basal in CON, 20 X basal in POR, and 10X basal in HAT, whereas levels in the periphery and liver were the same in HAT and CON. The glucose infusion rate required to maintain hyperglycemia was significantly greater in POR (8.5 +/- 0.7 mg center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1), final 2 h) than in either CON or HAT (6.0 +/- 0.5 or 6.7 +/- 1.0 mg center dot kg(-1) center dot min(-1), respectively). There were no differences among groups in either arterial plasma insulin (24 +/- 2, 23 +/- 3, and 23 +/- 3 mu U/ml for CON, POR, and HAT, respectively) or glucagon (23 +/- 2, 30 +/- 3, and 25 +/- 2 pg/ml) levels during the experimental period. The increased need for glucose infusion reflected greater nonhepatic as opposed to liver glucose uptake. GLP-1 infusion increased glucose disposal independently of changes in pancreatic hormone secretion but only when the peptide was delivered intraportally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据