4.7 Article

A locally conservative finite element framework for the simulation of coupled flow and reservoir geomechanics

期刊

ACTA GEOTECHNICA
卷 2, 期 3, 页码 139-153

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11440-007-0033-0

关键词

Geomechanics; Iteratively coupled; Local mass conservation; Mixed finite elements; Oil and gas; Poroelasticity; Reservoir; Unconditionally stable; Undrained split

资金

  1. Stanford University Petroleum Research Institute for Reservoir Simulation (SUPRI-B)
  2. Foundation CMG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we present a computational framework for the simulation of coupled flow and reservoir geomechanics. The physical model is restricted to Biot's theory of single-phase flow and linear poroelasticity, but is sufficiently general to be extended to multiphase flow problems and inelastic behavior. The distinctive technical aspects of our approach are: (1) the space discretization of the equations. The unknown variables are the pressure, the fluid velocity, and the rock displacements. We recognize that these variables are of very different nature, and need to be discretized differently. We propose a mixed finite element space discretization, which is stable, convergent, locally mass conservative, and employs a single computational grid. To ensure stability and robustness, we perform an implicit time integration of the fluid flow equations. (2) The strategies for the solution of the coupled system. We compare different solution strategies, including the fully coupled approach, the usual (conditionally stable) iteratively coupled approach, and a less common unconditionally stable sequential scheme. We show that the latter scheme corresponds to a modified block Jacobi method, which also enjoys improved convergence properties. This computational model has been implemented in an object-oriented reservoir simulator, whose modular design allows for further extensions and enhancements. We show several representative numerical simulations that illustrate the effectiveness of the approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据