4.7 Article

Effect of formulated zimmu (Allium cepa L. x Allium sativum L.) extract in the management of grain mold of sorghum

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 87, 期 13, 页码 2495-2501

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3010

关键词

Sorghum bicolor; grain mold; botanicals; formulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The in vitro antifungal activity of zimmu (Allium cepa L. x Allium sativum L.) extract against Aspergillus flavus Link., Fusarium moniliforme Sheld, Curvularia lunata (Wakker) Boedijn and Alternaria alternata (Fr.) Keissler, the fungi associated with grain mold of sorghum, was evaluated. An emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation of zimmu extract was prepared and its efficacy in controlling grain mold was tested under field conditions. RESULTS: The leaf extract of zimmu exhibited strong antifungal activity against A. flavus, F. moniliforme, C. lunata and A. alternata and caused in vitro fungal growth inhibition of 73.3%, 71.1%, 70.0% and 74.4%, respectively. Foliar application of zimmu formulation 50 EC at 3 mLL(-1) (v/v) concentration 60, 75 and 90 days after sowing significantly reduced the incidence of grain mold and increased the grain weight and grain hardness. A significant reduction in the aflatoxin B1 content in sorghum grains was observed when sorghum plants were sprayed with zimmu formulation 50 EC at 0.3% concentration. Western blot analysis revealed that a thaumatin-like protein (TLP) a molecular mass of 23 kDa that cross-reacted with zeamatin antiserum was expressed at higher levels in sorghum grains after treatment with zimmu formulations. CONCLUSION: The leaf extract of zimmu exhibited antifungal activity against sorghum grain mold fungi. The formulated zimmu extract was significantly effective in reducing the grain mold incidence in sorghum under field conditions. This formulated zimmu extract offers a novel alternative for eco-friendly management of grain mold of sorghum. (C) 2007 Society of Chemical Industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据