3.9 Article

Caffeine effects on risky decision making after 75 hours of sleep deprivation

期刊

AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 78, 期 10, 页码 957-962

出版社

AEROSPACE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.2106.2007

关键词

Iowa Gambling Task; risk-taking; executive function; prefrontal cortex; wakefulness; sleep loss; somatic marker hypothesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Recent research indicates that sleep deprivation impairs decision making. However, it is unknown to what extent such deficits are exacerbated in a dose-response manner by increasing levels of sleepiness, and the extent to which such sleep-loss-induced deficits can be reversed by caffeine. Methods: At three time points, 26 healthy subjects completed alternate forms of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT): rested baseline, 51 h awake, and 75 h awake. Every 2 h each night, 12 volunteers also received 4 200-mg doses of caffeine, with the last dose occurring 3 h prior to the IGT. Results: At baseline, volunteers readily learned to avoid disadvantageous high-risk card decks while progressively choosing more frequently from advantageous low-risk card decks. When sleep deprived, however, these same subjects showed impaired performance, choosing more frequently from the disadvantageous high-risk card decks, particularly during the latter half of the game. Contrary to expectations, the severity of performance impairment did not increase significantly from 51 to 75 h of wakefulness, and caffeine had no significant effects on IGT performance during sleep deprivation. Discussion and Conclusions: As a provisional extension of our previous study, these preliminary findings further suggest that the ability to integrate emotion with cognition to guide decision making, a capacity believed to be mediated by the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, may be particularly vulnerable to sleep loss. Moreover, these capacities may not be significantly improved by moderate doses of caffeine, suggesting that they may function separately from simple arousal and alertness systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据