4.3 Article

Taxonomic review and phylogenetic analysis of Enchodontoidei (Teleostei: Aulopiformes)

期刊

ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 483-511

出版社

ACAD BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS
DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37652011000200010

关键词

Aulopiformes; Enchodontoidei; phylogeny; taxonomy

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [476708/2004-4]
  2. Fundacao Carlos Chagas de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) [E-26/171.215/2004]
  3. CNPq (Brazilian Federal Government)
  4. FAPERJ (Jovem Cientista do Nosso Estado)
  5. PROCIENCIA (Rio de Janeiro State Government)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enchodontoidei are extinct marine teleost fishes with a long temporal range and a wide geographic distribution. As there has been no comprehensive phylogenetic study of this taxon, we performed a parsimony analysis using a data matrix with 87 characters, 31 terminal taxa for ingroup, and three taxa for outgroup. The analysis produced 93 equally parsimonious trees (L = 437 steps; CI = 0.24; RI = 0.49). The topology of the majority rule consensus tree was: (Sardinioides + Hemisaurida + (Nardorex + (Atolvorator + (Protostomias + Yabrudichthys) + (Apateopholis + (Serrilepis + (Halec + Phylactocephalus) + (Cimolichthys + (Prionolepis + ((Eurypholis + Saurorhamphus) + (Enchodus + (Paleolycus + Parenchodus))))))) + ((Ichthyotringa + Apateodus) + (Rharbichthys + (Trachinocephalus + ((Apuliadercetis + Brazilodercetis) + (Benthesikyme + (Cyranichthys + Robertichthys) + (Dercetis + Ophidercetis)) + (Caudadercetis + (Pelargorhynchus + (Nardodercetis + (Rhynchodercetis + (Dercetoides + Hastichthys)))))). The group Enchodontoidei is not monophyletic. Dercetidae form a clade supported by the presence of very reduced neural spines and possess a new composition. Enchodontidae are monophyletic by the presence of middorsal scutes, and Rharbichthys was excluded. Halecidae possess a new composition, with the exclusion of Hemisaurida. This taxon and Nardorex are Aulopiformes incertae sedis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据