4.6 Article

Activation of Ca2+-dependent protein kinase II during repeated contractions in single muscle fibres from mouse is dependent on the frequency of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ release

期刊

ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA
卷 191, 期 2, 页码 131-137

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01725.x

关键词

AC3-I; Ca2+; CaMKII; fatigue; KN; 93; sarcoplasmic reticulum; skeletal muscle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To investigate the importance and contribution of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) activity on sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+-release in response to different work intensities in single, intact muscle fibres. Methods: CaMKII activity was blocked in single muscle fibres using either the inhibitory peptide AC3-I or the pharmacological inhibitor KN-93. The effect on tetanic force production and [Ca2+](i) was determined during work of different intensities. The activity of CaMKII was assessed by mathematical modelling. Results: Using a standard protocol to induce fatigue (50x 70 Hz, 350 ms duration, every 2 s) the number of stimuli needed to induce fatigue was decreased from 47 +/- 3 contractions in control to 33 +/- 3 with AC3-I. KN-93 was a more potent inhibitor, decreasing the number of contractions needed to induce fatigue to 15 +/- 3. Tetanic [Ca2+](i) was 100 +/- 11%, 97 +/- 11% and 67 +/- 11% at the end of stimulation in control, AC3-I and KN-93 respectively. A similar inhibition was obtained using a high intensity protocol (20x 70 Hz, 200 ms duration, every 300 ms). However, using a long interval protocol (25x 70 Hz, 350 ms duration, every 5 s) no change was observed in either tetanic [Ca2+](i) or force when inhibiting CaMKII. A mathematical model used to investigate the activation pattern of CaMKII suggests that there is a threshold of active CaMKII that has to be surpassed in order for CaMKII to affect SR Ca2+ release. Conclusion: Our results show that CaMKII is crucial for maintaining proper SR Ca2+ release and that this is regulated in a work intensity manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据