4.7 Article

Survival of Enterobacter sakazakii in infant cereal as affected by composition, water activity, and temperature

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 7-8, 页码 767-777

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2007.02.001

关键词

Enterobacter sakazakii; infant cereal; water activity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enterobacter sakazakii infections in preterm neonates and infants have been epidemiologically associated with consumption of reconstituted powdered infant formula. The bacterium has been isolated from grain, infant cereals, and cereal factory environments. A study was done to determine the survival characteristics of E sakazakii initially at populations of 0.31 and 5.03 log CFU/g of infant rice cereal (a(w) 0.30 0.45-0.46, and 0.68-0.69). Cereal was stored at 4, 21, and 30 degrees C and populations were monitored for up to 12 months. Survival of the pathogen in infant rice, barley, oatmeal, and mixed grain cereals (a(w) 0.63-0.66, 0.76, or 0.82-0.83) initially containing a population of 4.93-5.64 log CFU/g and held at 4, 2 1, and 30 degrees C up to 24 weeks was determined. Populations decreased significantly (p <= 0.05) in all cereals stored at 21 and 30 degrees C regardless of a(w). Increases in a(w) or storage temperature accelerated the rate of death of E sakazakii in dry infant cereals. However, at an initial population of 0.31 log CFU/g, E sakazakii survived in rice cereal (a, 0.30-0.69) for up to 12 months at all storage temperatures. Survival of E sakazakii was not affected by the composition of dry infant rice, barley, mixed grain, and oatmeal cereals (initial a(w) 0.63-0.83) stored for up to 24 weeks at 4, 21, or 30 degrees C. This study demonstrated that E sakazakii can survive for LIP to 12 months in infant cereals having a wide range of a(w) when storage is at temperatures simulating those to which they may be exposed during distribution, at retail, and in the home. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据