4.5 Article

Longitudinal study of keratoconus progression

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
卷 85, 期 4, 页码 502-507

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.06.016

关键词

keratoconus; progression; videokeratography

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY009052] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To determine if differences in topographic progression between unaffected keratoconus relatives and normal controls can predict factors associated with the development of keratoconus in a longitudinal study. We recruited 369 unaffected keratoconus relatives and 119 normal controls in Los Angeles. Both eyes of subjects were examined at baseline clinically and by quantitative videokeratography and at a period ranging from I year to 8 years. Progression to keratoconus was evaluated by quantitative videokeratography variables. Unaffected relatives had higher Central K (CK), T-S and KISA values and were younger than normal controls (CK: 44.70 vs 44.01, P < 0.01; I-S: 0.76 vs 0.58, P < 0.01, KISA: 29.97 vs 23.89, P = 0.02; age: 34.8 vs 41.0, P < 0.01) at baseline. All three indices significantly increased with age, and CK and KISA values were associated with a positive family history for keratoconus (P < 0.001 for CK and P = 0.05 for KISA), however, the two groups were not statistically different in progression of keratoconus. After grouping unaffected relatives as high risk (age <= 30 or Central K >= 47.2 and I-S >= 1.2 or KISA >= 60) and low risk (age > 30 and Central K < 47.2 and I-S < 1.2 and KISA >= 60), relatives in the high risk group had a greater increase in CK and T-S values than those in the low risk group (CK: P = 0.009; I-S: P < 0.001), which indicated that there were significantly different rates of progression between two groups. Unaffected relatives had higher videokeratography indices than normal controls, but overall they did not progress to keratoconus quicker than normal controls. However, relatives in the high risk group may have a greater risk of progression to keratoconus. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据