4.7 Article

Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration after pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 2608-2612

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-0870

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS46259-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, noninvasive, clinical examination technique that quantifies small nerve fiber pathology. We have used it to assess the neurological benefits of pancreas transplantation in type I diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - In 20 patients with type I diabetes undergoing simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and 15 control subjects, corneal sensitivity was evaluated using noncontact corneal esthesiometry, and small nerve fiber morphology was assessed using CCM. RESULTS - Corneal sensitivity (1.54 +/- 0.28 vs. 0.77 +/- 0.02, P < 0.0001), nerve fiber density (NFD) (13.8 +/- 2. 1 vs. 42 +/- 3.2, P < 0. 000 1), nerve branch density (NBD) (4.04 +/- 1.5 vs. 26.7 +/- 2.5, P < 0.0001), and nerve fiber length (NFL) (2.23 +/- 0.2 vs. 9.69 +/- 0.7, P < 0.0001) were significantly reduced, and nerve fiber tortuosity (NFT) (15.7 +/- 1.02 vs. 19.56 +/- 1.34, P = 0.04) was increased in diabetic patients before pancreas transplantation. Six months after SPK, 15 patients underwent a second assessment and showed a significant improvement in NFD (18.04 +/- 10.48 vs. 9.25 +/- 1.87, P = 0.001) and NFL (3.60 +/- 0.33 vs. 1.84 +/- 0.33, P = 0.002) with no change in NBD (1.38 +/- 0.74 vs. 1.38 +/- 1.00, P = 1.0), NFT (15.58 +/- 1.20 vs. 16.30 +/- 1.19, P = 0.67), or corneal sensitivity (1.23 +/- 0.39 vs. 1.54 +/- 00.42, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS - Despite marked nerve fiber damage in type I diabetic patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, small fiber repair can be detected within 6 months of pancreas transplantation using CCM. CCM is a novel noninvasive clinical technique to assess the benefits of therapeutic intervention in human diabetic neuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据