4.7 Article

Extraction and preconcentration of toxic metal ions from aqueous solution using benzothiazole-based chelating resins

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 47-55

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2007.05.006

关键词

extraction; preconcentration; heavy metal; benzothiazole; chelating resin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polystyrene-divinylbenzene resin (PS-DVB) was functionalized with a benzothiazole group. PS-DVB with amino group was initially prepared by nitration and reduction reactions and subsequently treated with ethyl 2-benzothiazolylacetate (BA) to obtain the chelating resin with an amide linkage (BA-PS-DVB). Meanwhile, the amino-PS-DVB was diazotized and coupled with BA to obtain the chelating resin with an azo linkage (azo-BA-PS-DVB). The resins were characterized by elemental analysis and infrared spectroscopy and evaluated for their extraction of Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions in water before their determinations by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). Extraction conditions were optimized for batch method such as the pH of the solution, the extraction time and the adsorption isotherm. The optimum pH for the extraction of Cd(II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) are 8.0, 7.0 and 6.0, respectively, while the equilibrium time of all ions was reached within 10-20 min. The adsorption behavior of all the metal ions followed the Langmuir adsorption isotherm. In the column method, the optimum flow rates of metal sorption onto BA-PS-DVB and azo-BA-PS-DVB columns were 2.5 and 4.0 mL min(-1). Metal ions sorbed onto columns were eluted by 0.5 to 2.0 M HNO3. The preconcentration factors of Cd(II) and Cu(II) on azo-BA-PS-DVB and Cu(II) on BA-PS-DVB were 50, 50, and 20, respectively. The present column method gave acceptable validation results: 71.2 and 74.0% recovery for Cd(II) and Cu(II) and an overall relative standard deviation (R.S.D) less than 10% (n=15). The proposed method was applicable for determining Cu(II) in drinking water. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据