4.5 Article

MicroRNAs in adult rodent liver are refractory to dioxin treatment

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 470-487

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm189

关键词

aryl hydrocarbon receptor; dioxin; 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; microRNA; microarray

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dioxin-like chemicals are well known for their ability to upregulate expression of numerous genes via the AH receptor (AHR). However, recent transcriptomic analyses in several laboratories indicate that dioxin-like chemicals or AHR genotype itself also can downregulate levels of mRNAs encoded by numerous genes. The mechanism responsible for such down-regulation is unknown. We hypothesized that microRNAs (miRNAs), which have emerged as powerful negative regulators of mRNA levels in several systems, might be responsible for mRNA down-regulation in dioxin/AHR pathways. We used two miRNA array platforms as well as quantitative reverse transcriptase -polymerase chain reaction to measure miRNA levels in wild-type (WT) versus Ahr-null mice, in dioxin-sensitive Long-Evans (L-E; Turku/AB) rats versus dioxin-resistant Han/Wistar (H/W; Kuopio) rats and in rat 5L and mouse Hepa-1 hepatoma cells in culture. Treatment with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in vivo caused few changes in miRNA levels in mouse or rat livers, and those changes that were statistically significant were of modest magnitude. Hepatoma cells in culture also exhibited few changes in miRNA levels in response to TCDD. AHR genotype had little effect on hepatic miRNA levels, either in constitutive expression or in response to TCDD-only a few miRNAs differed in expression between Ahr-null mice compared to mice with WT AHR or between L-E rats (that have WT AHR) compared to H/W rats (whose AHR has a large deletion in the transactivation domain). It is unlikely that mRNA downregulation by dioxins is mediated by miRNAs, nor are miRNAs likely to play a significant role in dioxin toxicity in adult rodent liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据