4.5 Article

Precocious development of hydatid cysts in a macropodid host

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 1379-1389

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.04.012

关键词

Echinococcus granulosus; pathology; hydatid; marsupial; macropodid; tammar wallaby; Macropus eugenii; Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study describes the pathological changes associated with an experimental infection of captive wallabies with Echinococcus granulosus. Adult and juvenile tammar wallabies (Macropus eugenii) were infected orally with 0, 1,000, 2,500 or 8,000 E. granulosus eggs. Lung cyst progression was monitored by chest radiography every 4 months until 16 months p.i. Animals were necropsied from 9 to 16 months after infection. Cysts were detected radiographically from 4 months onwards. The number of cysts per animal varied from one to 10 and the majority (36/40) of cysts established in the lungs. Infection rate was low (35.5%), but cyst development was more rapid and onset of fertility much earlier than has been recorded in sheep. Cyst growth resulted in loss of functional lung capacity, up to an estimated 28% within 14 months of infection. Degenerative changes in cysts were less common in tammars than has been reported in sheep, with gross degeneration of cysts identified in only two animals. Complications associated with lung cyst development included fatal anaphylaxis, pneumothorax and atelectasis. Seven of the 11 infected tammars died or were euthanased as a result of infection during the experiment. From the parasite's perspective, infection of this host allows a shortened life cycle and correspondingly greater biotic potential. We believe thin is the first published study that demonstrates the susceptibility of tammar wallabies to hydatid disease and confirms their suitability as a laboratory model for studying the disease in macropodids. (c) 2007 Australian Society for Parasitology Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据