4.6 Article

Field geometry, petrography and geochemistry of a dolomitization front (Late Jurassic, central Lebanon)

期刊

SEDIMENTOLOGY
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 1093-1119

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00874.x

关键词

Sr-87/Sr-86; dolomite field geometry; dolomite stoichiometry; Fe-Mn; concentrations; fluid inclusions; hydrothermal dolomite

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This contribution describes the field geometry, petrography and geochemistry of a well-exposed dolomitization front in Upper Jurassic carbonates, and attempts to highlight the sedimentological, structural and relative sea-level controls on multiphase dolomitization and related diagenetic events. The data presented reflect the superposition of various diagenetic phases which have resulted in a single dolostone body, whose dimensions are well defined in the field. Local microbial intraclastic dolomites of Late Tithonian age accumulated in a hypersaline lagoon during relative sea-level fall. These pre-date beige hydrothermal dolostones (51 to 55 mol% CaCO3; delta O-18: -9.3 to -4.0 parts per thousand V-PDB; delta C-13: -1.5 to +2.1 parts per thousand V-PDB; Sr-87/Sr-86: 0.70742; matrix porosity: approximate to 6%; Klinkenberg permeability: approximate to 0.5 mD), whose dolomitizing fluid circulated along faults and invaded the nearby facies. First, the burrows were dolomitized, then the bulk rocks, resulting in the investigated 'tongue'-shaped dolomite body. Upon Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous uplift, near-surface water percolated through - and altered - the underlying beige dolostones. This event was followed by a ferroan dolomite cement phase, which occurred during further burial. This contribution, featuring a well-defined geometric pattern of a dolomitization front with a large petrographic and geochemical data set, may also serve as a case study illustrating the complexity of superimposed diagenetic processes which have to be taken into account in modelling exercises of multiphase hydrothermal dolomitization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据