4.7 Article

Light intensity and wavelength during embryo manipulation are important factors for maintaining viability of preimplantation embryos in vitro

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 1150-1157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.036

关键词

hamster embryo; lighting; preimplantation development; Hsp70; reactive oxygen species (ROS); apoptosis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2006-07531] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To optimize embryo culture system by evaluating lighting effect during in vitro manipulation. Design: Randomized prospective study using an animal model. Setting: Gamete and Stem Cell Biotechnology Laboratory at Seoul National University in Korea. Animal(s): Twelve- to 15-week-old hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Intervention(S): Two-cell embryos were manipulated in vitro under lighting of different intensities and wavelengths. Main Outcome Measure(s): Preimplantation development, Hsp70 expression, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and blastomere apoptosis. Result(s): A significant. increase in morula and blastocyst fort-nation was detected at 200 lux compared with 900 lux visible ray lighting, but not compared with 500 lux. At 200-lux lighting,red (620-750 nm) ray yielded the best development, whereas blue (445-500 nm) decreased blastocyst formation. Compared with the visible ray, Hsp70 expression and ROS generation in morula were increased in the blue ray but decreased in the red ray lighting. The blue ray also reduced blastocyst quality with increasing blastomere apoptosis. Conclusion(s): Specific wavelength of visible ray increases Hsp70 expression, ROS generation, and blastomere apoptosis. Therefore, removing this stress factor improves embryo development. (Fertil Steril (R) 2007;88(Suppl 2): 1150-7. (C)2007 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据