4.5 Article

Clinical evaluation of ganaxolone in pediatric and adolescent patients with refractory epilepsy

期刊

EPILEPSIA
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 1870-1874

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.01182.x

关键词

neurosteroid; allopregnanolone; infantile spasms; anticonvulsant; West syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: A pilot study of the safety, tolerability, dose range and potential efficacy of ganaxolone for the treatment of refractory epilepsy in pediatric and adolescent subjects. Methods: We report the results of a non-randomized, non-blinded, open-label, dose-escalation trial of ganaxolone in pediatric subjects (5-15 years) suffering from refractory epilepsy. Subjects received an oral suspension of ganaxolone in a 1: 1 complex with P-cyclodextrin in a dose escalation (1 mg/kg, b.i.d. to 12 mg/kg t.i.d.) schedule over 16 days. This was followed by a maintenance period for 8 weeks. Subjects that showed significant response were eligible for a compassionate use extension period. Results: Fifteen subjects enrolled, eight completed the trial and three continued in the open-label compassionate use extension period. All subject exhibited refractory partial or generalized epilepsy. In an intent-to-treat analysis, four (25%) were considered substantial responders (>= 50% reduction in seizure frequency), two (13%) were considered moderate responders (between 25 and 50% reduction in seizure frequency) and the remainder were considered nonresponders (<24% reduction). Three subjects entered the extension phase, one remained essentially seizure-free for over 3.5 years of ganaxolone administration. Ganaxolone was tolerated well. A total of 17 adverse events were reported in 10 patients, all were considered mild to moderate in severity. Somnolence was the most frequently (nine) reported adverse event. Conclusions: This pilot study is consistent with other clinical studies indicating that ganaxolone has anticonvulsant activity in humans. The results of this study encourage the further study of ganaxolone as an antiepileptic therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据