4.6 Review

Daily administration of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for urological and nonurological indications

期刊

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 990-1005

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.048

关键词

sildenafil; vardenafil; tadalafil; phosphodiesterase (type) 5; inhibitors; erectile dysfunction; dosing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Although the discovery of phosphodiesterases (PDEs) was made soon after the identification of cyclic adenosine monophosphate nearly half a century ago, their true importance in medicine has taken many decades to be realised. The recognition of the important role PIDE enzymes play and the impact of altering intracellular cyclic nucleotide levels became significant for most urologists and clinicians in the early 1990s with the discovery of sildenafil, a PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5-I). Once approved around the world, on-demand use of PDE5-Is became the gold standard. Recently, the potential beneficial effects of PDE5-Is on the pulmonary, vascular, and other systems has led to examination of alternative dosing regimens. In this review, we have synthesised the available published peer-reviewed literature to provide a critical contemporary view of evolving indications for PDE5-Is and how alternative dosing regimens may impact on sexual and other functions. Methods: MEDLINE search of all peer-reviewed English literature for the period 1990-2007. Results: The plethora of articles detailing potential uses of PDE5-1 in multiple fields of medicine was uncovered. Use of alternative dosing regimens shows great promise across a number of clinical indications, including post-radical retropubic prostatectomy, pulmonary hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and salvage of on-demand PDE5-1 nonresponders. Conclusions: Use of PDE5-1 on a daily basis may evolve into a major form of drug administration both for men with erectile dysfunction and for those with a myriad of other conditions shown to benefit from this approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据