4.7 Article

Bortezomib inhibits nuclear factor-κB-dependent survival and has potent in vivo activity in mesothelioma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 19, 页码 5942-5951

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0536

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Purpose of this study has been the assessment of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) as a survival factor in human mesothelial cells (HMC), transformed HMC and malignant mesothelioma (MMe) cells. We aimed at verifying whether the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib could abrogate NF-kappa B activity in We cells, leading to tumor cell death and may be established as a novel treatment for this aggressive neoplasm. Experimental Design: In HMC and MMe cells, NF-kappa B nuclear translocation and DNA binding were studied by electrophoretic mobility shift assay, following treatment with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (JNF-alpha). The IKK inhibitor Bay11-7082 was also tested to evaluate its effects on HMC, transformed HMC, and MMe cell viability upon exposure to asbestos fibers. Following Bortezomib treatment, cytotoxicity of MMe cells was evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, whereas apoptosis and cell-cycle blockade were investigated by high-content analysis. Bortezomib was also given to mice bearing i.p. xenografts of MMe cells, and its effects on tumor growth were evaluated. Results: Here, we show that NF-kappa B activity is a constitutive survival factor in transformed HMC, We cells, and acts as a survival factor in HMC exposed to asbestos fibers. Bortezomib inhibits NF-kappa B activity in We cells and induces cell cycle blockade and apoptosis in vitro as well as tumor growth inhibition in vivo. Conclusions: Inhibition of NF-kappa B constitutive activation in We cells by Bortezomib resulted in in vitro cytotoxicity along with apoptosis and in vivo tumor regression. Our results support the use of Bortezomib in the treatment of MMe and has led to a phase II clinical trial currently enrolling in Europe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据