4.6 Article

The role of the prostaglandin D2 receptor, DP, in eosinophil trafficking

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 7, 页码 4792-4799

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4792

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostaglandin (PG) D-2 is a major mast cell product that acts via two receptors, the D-type prostanoid (DP) and the chemoattractant receptor- homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTH2) receptors. Whereas CRTH2 mediates the chemotaxis 4 eosinophils, basophils, and Th2 lymphocytes, the role of DP has remained unclear. We report in this study that, in addition to CRTH2, the DP receptor plays an important role in eosinophil trafficking. First, we investigated the release of eosinophils from bone marrow using the in situ perfused guinea pig hind limb preparation. PGD(2) induced the rapid release of eosinophils from hot marrow and this effect was inhibited by either the DP receptor antagonist BWA868c or the CRTH2 receptor antagonist ramatroban. In contrast, BWA868c did not inhibit the release of bone marrow eosinophils when this was induced by the CRTH2-selective agonist 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGD(2). In additional experiments, we isolated bone marrow eosinophils from the femoral cavity and found that these cells migrated toward PGD(2). We also observed that BWA868c inhibited this response to a similar extent as ramatroban. Finally, using inummohistochemistry we could demonstrate that eosinophils in human bone marrow specimens expressed DP and CRTH2 receptors at similar levels. Eosinophils isolated from human peripheral blood likewise expressed D receptor protein but at lower levels than CRTH2. In agreement with this, the chemotaxis of human peripheral blood eosinophils was inhibited both by BWA868c and ramatroban. These findings suggest that DP receptors comediate with CRTH2 the mobilization of eosinophils from bone marrow and their chemotaxis, which might provide the rationale for DP antagonists in the treatment of allergic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据